Submission of Revised Budgets

If a revision of the statement of work is necessary, with or without a revision of the budget, the full MIT internal routing and review process must be completed.

For revised budgets that do not require the submission of a revised statement of work, the review process is:

  • Principal Investigator
  • Department head or laboratory director, including department head of each faculty member identified by name in a proposed budget submitted by another department, laboratory, or center, except where the home department has waived its review
  • Dean, if the department or laboratory/center reports to the dean, only if the revised budget:
    • includes unusual features such as underrecovery of F&A costs, cost sharing, and space change implications, and
    • the revised budget has an annual budget greater than $2 million
  • RAS Contract Administrator

PLEASE NOTE The Following Requirements:

Requirement to route budget through Kuali Coeus:

  • Announced at forum 11/5/2014 *
  • Took effect 11/6/14
  • No more emailed budgets

See this QuickCard on Proposal Types (PDF)

Requirement to use Kuali Coeus detailed budget module:

  • no more summary budgets with uploaded spreadsheets - takes effect 5/1/2015

See Award Budget Project Presentation [PDF] (2015)